首页> 外文OA文献 >Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX
【2h】

Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX

机译:数字X射线放射线照相术在骨质疏松性骨折研究中的应用:与双能X线骨密度仪和FRAX的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Osteoporosis is often underdiagnosed and undertreated. Screening of post -menopausal women for clinical risk factors and/or low bone mineral density (BMD) has been proposed to overcome this. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) estimates hand BMD from standard hand X-ray images and have shown to predict fractures and osteoporosis. Recently, digital radiology and the internet have opened up the possibility of conducting automated opportunistic screening with DXR in post -fracture care or in combination with mammography. This study compared the performance of DXR with FRAX (R) and DXA in discriminating major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) (hip, clinical spine, forearm or shoulder), hip fracture and femoral neck osteoporosis. This prospective cohort study was conducted on 5278 women 65 years and older in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) cohort Baseline hand X-ray images were analyzed and fractures were ascertained during 10 years of follow up. Age -adjusted area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for MOF and hip fracture and for femoral neck osteoporosis (DXA FN BMD T -score <= -2.5) was used to compare the methods. Sensitivity to femoral neck osteoporosis at equal selection rates was tabulated for FRAX and DXR. DXR-BMD, FRAX (no BMD) and lumbar spine DXA BMD were all similar in fracture discriminative performance with an AUC around 0.65 for MOF and 0.70 for hip fractures for all three methods. As expected femoral neck DXA provided fracture discrimination superior both to other BMD measurements and to FRAX. AUC for selection of patients with femoral neck osteoporosis was higher with DXR-BMD, 0.76 (0.74-0.77), than with FRAX, 0.69 (0.67-0.71), (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, DXR-BMD discriminates incident fractures to a similar degree as FRAX and predicts femoral neck osteoporosis to a larger degree than FRAX. DXR shows promise as a method to automatically flag individuals who might benefit from an osteoporosis assessment (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
机译:骨质疏松症常常被诊断不足和治疗不足。已经提出了对绝经后妇女进行临床危险因素和/或低骨矿物质密度(BMD)筛查的方法,以克服这一问题。数字X射线放射线照相术(DXR)通过标准的手部X射线图像估计手部BMD,并显示出预测的骨折和骨质疏松症。近来,数字放射学和互联网为在骨折后护理中或与乳腺X线照相术结合使用DXR进行自动机会性筛查的可能性提供了可能性。这项研究比较了DXR与FRAX(R)和DXA在区分主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)(髋关节,临床脊柱,前臂或肩膀),髋部骨折和股骨颈骨质疏松症方面的表现。这项前瞻性队列研究是在骨质疏松性骨折(SOF)队列研究中对5278名65岁及65岁以上的女性进行的。对基线手部X射线图像进行了分析,并在随访的10年中确定了骨折。使用MOF和髋部骨折以及股骨颈骨质疏松症的接受者工作特征曲线(AUC)下的年龄调整的面积(DXA FN BMD T-得分<=-2.5)进行比较。 FRAX和DXR以相同的选择率列出了对股骨颈骨质疏松症的敏感性。 DXR-BMD,FRAX(无BMD)和腰椎DXA BMD的骨折鉴别性能均相似,这三种方法的MOF的AUC约为0.65,髋部骨折的AUC约为0.70。如所期望的,股骨颈DXA可以提供优于其他BMD测量和FRAX的骨折鉴别能力。 DXR-BMD为0.76(0.74-0.77),用于选择股骨颈骨质疏松患者的AUC高于FRAX为0.69(0.67-0.71),(p <0.0001)。总之,DXR-BMD可以与FRAX相似地区分突发性骨折,并预测股骨颈骨质疏松症的发生率要高于FRAX。 DXR展示了一种有望自动标记可能从骨质疏松症评估中受益的人的方法(C)2016 The Authors。由Elsevier Inc.发布。这是CC BY许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)下的开放获取文章。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号